Islamic Republic of Iran and the Strategic Paralysis of Iraq in the Imposed War

Wars are the scene of collision and confrontation of thoughts and decisions. Therefore, defeats and victories are formed in the minds and thoughts of leaders and commanders before the battlefield, since the outcome of thoughts and decisions is manifested in the form of strategies. Examining the history of Military wars reveals that three strategic logics of "destruction", "erosion" and "control" have ruled over these conflicts
 
Strategic paralysis is a thought which is designed to achieve control logic. The main goal in strategic paralysis will be the destruction of the organization of the operational forces, the absence of concentration of the command echelons and the forces and the destruction of the enemy's will and its ability to resist and fight. Therefore, the main focus of the discussion is on the command system.
 
Strategic paralysis means using the opponent's vulnerabilities and weaknesses to restrain and strike his strengths. The purpose of this article is to answer these main questions: what is strategic paralysis and can we find examples in this regard in the imposed war as well?